Losses of 3. Army, 27.2 - 8.4.42.




"About tank losses of the 3rd Army for the period of 27.2 - 8.4.42.







TanksHeavyMediumLightTankettesTotal
Available on 27.2.362027550381
Ready for action on 27.2.291924845341
Replacements from 27.2. to 8.4.4230---29100159
   


Losses

TanksHeavyMediumLightTankettesTotal
Knocked-out251214723207
Burned-out---68617109
Disabled by mines2---17221
Missing12---25


From the number of losses:

TanksHeavyMediumLightTankettesTotal
Cannot be repaired--3392163
Not evacuated from the battlefield7470586
Need capital repair5472687
In medium repair24118
Repaired from the number of knocked-out and mined tanks. x/213879120


Tanks operational on 8.4.42 - 51 heavy tanks, 3 medium tanks, 120 light tanks and 111 tankettes for a total of 285 tanks.

x/ Note: Many tanks were repaired twice, which is not reflected in this collumn.


Signed Deputy Commander of the tank forces of Crimean Front, Major-General of the Tank Forces Volsky, on 13th April 1942."

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bad history weekend No.1 : The case of (not so) one-shot Tiger II

Image
   It always turns out the same when one starts discussing the German tanks. It inevitably turns to Tigers and Panthers, which inevitably turns to either their reliability, or actual quality of their armor. Which will naturally lead to what people consider the holy grail on this subject, the test of Tiger II published on the English speaking side of the internet by the tank archives blog. It can be found here -  http://www.tankarchives.ca/2013/03/is-2-vs-german-big-cats.html  .    What is it about? Well, it is a rather "scathing review" based on a test of various guns performed on a Tiger II hull and turret, along with a different test of a Panther, which is not relevant now. What is relevant, is a rather large number of visual and contextual peculiarities for a comparatively short text. One hit Knock-out?     Author of the blog goes out of his way in setting-up a particular picture about this particular Tiger and this particular test. One ca...
Read more

Motorisation in Wehrmacht, Foreign acquisitions and first combat experiences.

Image
Loot Force One begins    In the previous article, I jumped a fair bit ahead, and I nearly forgot about one very interesting aspect of Wehrmacht's procurement - common thievery. Or rather, the use of captured equipment, surely the most extensive in WW II, and perhaps the most extensive ever. Austria: First steps    Anschluss gave Germans a great opportunity to practice mobile operations outside of combat, and they also acquired a modest number of austrian weapons and factories for their own use. Bofors 40 mm AA guns that continued production after the Anschluss in Vienna Arsenal, along with a small number of Oerlikon 20 mm guns, several thousand artillery pieces and small arms . Most important, for the motorpool atleast, was the addition of Steyr company, and several other small companies that provided space and production capacities to manufacture many competitive truck types, like Steyr 640, a 1,5 ton, 6x4 vehicle, which was one of the first foreign tru...
Read more

German tank losses on the Eastern front, report from the Inspector of Panzertruppen

Image
"German tank losses on the east between 22.6.41 and 21.12.1944 Russians report 70 366 german tanks destroyed from 22.6.41 to 31.12.1944    For the same time period,  the following actual losses of armored fighting vehicles were reported  by GenStdH/Gen.Qu. :"    Table is organized in collumns for tanks, StuGs, Self-proppeled artillery and Sp. AT-guns, halftracks and armored cars and "other". Panzers include - Pz I - VI, 38(t), command tanks, observation tanks and flamethrower tanks. StuGs include - StuG III, StuH, Sturmpanzer, jagdpanzer IV and 38(t), Jagdpanther and Elefant. Self-proppeled artillery and Sp. AT-guns inc. - AT-guns on Pz II and 38(t), Nashorn, Wespe, Hummel and Sp. guns on 38(t). Other inc. - munnition panzer III and IV, Bergepanzers III, IV and 38(t), flakpanzers on 38(t) and panzer IV chassis and Borgwards .
Read more